Stump Lane
in the dirt since history began

By Montag @ 12:00 AM
Filed under: Saturday Morning Post

December 31, 2005

Ice Storm
Ice Storm

(more…)

By Montag @ 12:00 AM
Filed under: Saturday Morning Post

Ice Storm
Ice Storm

(more…)

By Montag @ 12:00 AM
Filed under: Saturday Morning Post

Ice Storm
Ice Storm

(more…)

By Montag @ 12:00 AM
Filed under: Saturday Morning Post

Ice Storm
Ice Storm

(more…)

By Montag @ 12:00 AM
Filed under: Saturday Morning Post

Ice Storm
Ice Storm

(more…)

By Montag @ 12:00 AM
Filed under: Saturday Morning Post

Ice Storm
Ice Storm

(more…)

By Montag @ 12:00 AM
Filed under: Saturday Morning Post

Ice Storm
Ice Storm

(more…)

By Montag @ 12:00 AM
Filed under: Saturday Morning Post

Ice Storm
Ice Storm

(more…)

This is Not a Christmas Tree

By Montag @ 12:10 AM
Filed under: Saturday Morning Post

December 24, 2005

Holiday Tree
Shock and Awe

No, this is not a Christmas tree. It is the shock and awe of a thousand flying sleighs diving down out of the sky, runners white-hot from the friction of re-entry, and out of the smoke of battle as the War on Christmas rages on. Once again, through overwhelming force, the pagans, secularists, anti-consumerists, and non-Christian observers of other holidays will be vanquished and sent away for another year.

Screw You, We’re Taking a Vacation

By Montag @ 11:29 PM
Filed under: the stump

December 23, 2005

Holy smokes! Your Montag forgot to feed the blog today. Actually it’s not so much that I forgot. It’s more like I just didn’t fucking do it. It was a busy day, holiday-preparation wise, in terms of wrapping everything up at work prior to vacation, (a whole week,) and getting home in time to meet the delivery truck bringing the kids big present.

All of this brings us to this post’s main point. The coming week is vacation. If you thought the past week was sparse for legitimate posting, then next week will seem downright desolate. You’ll get your Saturday photos, and maybe, just maybe a post or two. Maybe not.

Have a good week.

Chilling Implications when Lobbyists Testify

By Montag @ 2:33 AM
Filed under: History's Rough Draft

December 21, 2005

The New York Times reports that lobbyist Jack Abramoff may be trying to cut a deal in exchange for testimony on Congressional corruption.

[NYT: Lobbyist Is Said to Discuss Plea and Testimony]

Well, that’s as wrong as four left feet! Lobbyists often rely on the corruptibility of politicians, who in turn rely on lobbyists to provide some level of confidentiality around the sometimes illegal, and often unethical, activities they engage in in the throes of governing.

Lobbyists testifying about their activities, and revealing the identities of their political sources, amounts to a breach of confidence that could place in jeopardy many lobbyist-politician relationships.

Abramoff’s testimony could have a chilling effect on the corruptibility of politicians, and their willingness to work with lobbyists to reach politically viable solutions to our nation’s problems. Congress will likely grind to a halt. The entire political process will be in peril of failing once the conduit for donations, perks and bribes is effectively removed from the system.

Jack Abramoff should follow Judith Miller’s lead and take one for the profession. He should allow himself to be imprisoned; both to uphold his promise to his sources and to protect the integrity of lobbyism in general.

Just think how petty those prosecutors will look, Jack, when they send you to jail because you wouldn’t compromise your ethics or break your word to your source(s). You’ll come out a martyr on the other end of this thing.

Older Posts »

Creative Commons License
Original text and images: Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License.
12 queries. 0.517 seconds. Powered by WordPress